• BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This repository contains a comprehensive list of 117.981 free and disposable email providers

    ProtonMail.com is a free email provider. Why would it not be on a list that contains free email providers? Gmail.com and Outlook.com are also on here, because they are also free email providers.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t think every list of disposable email providers that incorrectly includes ProtonMail deserves a post to !technology@lemmy.world. Lists that are widely used deserve that kind of attention, but this has two stars on Github.

    As BombOmOm points out, this list includes free email providers and the inclusion of ProtonMail is correct.

    • Nighed@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Looks like it has 2 stars… So I’m going to say no

      (Just from preview, didn’t follow link)

    • misophist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s a list of places you can get free, disposable email addresses. Protonmail fits here. Now, why anybody would use this list for mail filtering is a whole different question. They’d be blocking some huge email providers.

        • misophist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes, but some are more difficult to get. Personal domains cost money. Edu, gov, and most business emails are harder to get.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Quite a few companies block free email addresses from filling out forms due to abuse. Happens all the time.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Companies that engage in business to business services.

            Say you have a free demo of the product you’re selling, but you want to limit downloads to other legitimate businesses, because that’s your market.

            You gate it behind a form, and rig the form submission to reject free and ISP email addresses.

            So someone@microsoft.com - desirable and allowed. someone@aol.com or cox.net - not your market, block form submission.

            Happens ALL the time.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    You need to take it up with the owner of the repository if you have a beef with it, but I see no reason why it shouldn’t be on the list.

  • key@lemmy.keychat.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the second thread I’ve seen like this recently. Proton made a properly labeled throwaway github user to open issues on every repo with anti-abuse lists that contained their domains a few weeks ago. Now different throwaway users are opening new issues for the repos that declined to remove them and then posting to social media trying to rile up an outrage mob to flood the issues. Seems super sketch. Yet another reason to stay away from everything proton.