• ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Here’s a fun game:

        Pick any Wikipedia article. Click the first link. Keep clicking the first link. Eventually you’ll end up at Philosophy and forever be in a loop going back to Philosophy.

        Turns out conscious thinking and applying logical rigor is the basis for everything we perceive.

        • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m trying this out.

          Here’s the results: Shadow King (Marvel character): success after about 10 links

          Ernest Shackleton (article of the day): 10 clicks

          Wikipedia (the article): 4 clicks

          Church of the Holy Mother of God, Bolshiye Saly: 14 clicks

          James Loren Martin: 24 clicks

          Annette Ziegler: 14 clicks

          Almost all of them went through Philosophy of Science or Philosophy of Art. Seems like a pretty reliable rule.

      • Haagel@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You know what I mean, brother. There’s a huge scope of difference between applied sciences and natural philosophy. Our technological advancements fail to resolve fundamental questions about the human condition. Scientists rarely study epistemology or philosophy in order to attain our degrees and I think it shows in the public trend toward scientism.

          • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Lol, I love when the woo community can’t argue in good faith, so have to artificially drag science to their level by calling it “scientism”.

            Magic isn’t real because you can’t prove it’s real, and science isn’t opposed to magic, because magic isn’t on the playing board.

            • Grail@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’m a degree-holding job-working scientist and I love science. I also love magic. Magic can be proven. Scientists have published hundreds of papers on the powerful placebo effect, also known as magic. Don’t tell me you’re going to deny the existence of the placebo effect?