They all seem to have pro’s and con’s, not really sure why I have such a hard time choosing

    • jelloeater - Ops Mgr@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      7 months ago

      I’ve used XFCE for old netbooks, it always felt like it was too bare bones. But TBH it’s prob the lightest thing that doesn’t look like garbage.

      Cinnamon always felt like it was too fancy for me, but I get that it’s great for most folks.

      TBH if your using either Debian or Ubuntu, changing your DM is a much easier thing to flip flop on. Nixos always worries me for gaming.

    • ZephrC@lemm.eeEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, it’s kinda sad, because I really like Mate, but it does feel like it’s too much of a jack of all trades. It’s like Mate is always good, but there’s always a better option. Plus it seems like every update takes longer than the previous one. I’m starting to worry about it’s future.

  • superkret@feddit.deEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    As long as hitting the “Windows” key opens a menu with good search function out of the box, and Alt+Tab works, I literally don’t care anymore.

    • RossoErcole@kbin.social
      0·
      1 year ago

      I lack one thing from windows’ alt+tab, the ability to keep the alt+tab view while pressing alt+canc or alt+q to close that window.

      It allowed to much more efficiently clean my window mess

  • BoofStroke@lemm.eeEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago
    • cinnamon for modern desktop that just works with good workflow out of the box
    • mate for wobbly windows
    • xfce if running hardware from 20 years ago.
    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      0·
      1 year ago

      yeah the thing about window managers is it really depends on the distro and how they use it and extend it.