• krayj@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s already a link to the vid talking about the utter bullshit and corruption surrounding the McD’s ice cream machines posted in this thread, but here’s a resource I haven’t seen posted yet: an online tracker to find out if your local McD’s ice cream machine is working or broken right now.

    https://mcbroken.com/

    (love the domain name)

    • Aatube@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      I swear that site makes green dots smaller until they disappear when you zoom out. Still pretty cool though, our nearest McDonalds has a broken ice cream machine

      • krayj@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I don’t know is whether the UK has to comply with the same BS exclusive service contracts for their ice cream machines as the US does, or if it’s a similar arrangement only with different companies and manufacturers.

        The McD closest to my house is almost always unable to sell ice cream products - it’s down more often that it’s working.

      • krayj@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        They reverse engineered the ordering API (that the app uses) and try to add a McSundae to an online order. If the ice cream machine is broken, it won’t let you add that item to an order for the specific location. If the McSundae machine is working, it will let you add that item to the order for the designated location.

        It updates each location every 30 minutes, so is very up to date.

        More details about it here: https://hypebeast.com/2020/10/mcbroken-site-mcdonalds-ice-cream-machines-working-tracker-info

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        If its the one I know, it sends an online ice cream request through the API, and then cancels the successful ones before they reach the stores. The unsuccessful ones are broken machines, essentially.

      • nathanielcwm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        iirc it used to get it through a reverse engineering of the McDonald’s app api. Not sure about now tho

  • tesfabpel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    1 year ago

    BTW, fixing broken machines’ software (printers) was how Richard Stallman got so frustrated to invent the GPL license…

    • Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imagine being the guy who wrote so buggy software that you inadvertently saddled the entire world with rms

  • wick@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty sure they explicitly do not want legislators to think they will “hack” them. Is this article shillin’ for Taylor?

    • NotYourSocialWorker@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You probably already know but hacking originally meant to modify a machine for instance (or furniture as in ikea hacks) but it really is a word one should avoid when speaking with people who aren’t part of the communities that use it in its original meaning.

        • NotYourSocialWorker@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Earliest I’ve heard was from MIT and the pranks they do. I think that was from the fifties.

          Yes, Ikea hacks are much later. Me and my wife were doing it/calling it that around 2005 when we modded a desk. It was intended to be an example of the dual usage of the word hack.

      • chinpokomon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hacker vs. cracker. Hack isn’t a nefarious term, or at least it shouldn’t be. Hacking is just using something in an unintended way. The problem is with how DMCA made that am illegal thing to do if there was a digital lock. While intended to mean you can’t bypass CSS to rip movies from DVDs, it’s been used to block the right to repair and other things completely anti-consumer. But you probably know this.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        To hack means to chop something to pieces violently. It doesn’t matter what it used to be in the past - people now are using it differently. Language evolves over time and the most used interpretations survive.

        • NotYourSocialWorker@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          To “hack it” also means to be able to handle something. That there were multiple meanings for the word was never in question and I really do agree with you that language evolve over time and you simply need to learn to live with that.

          But also, if you go back and look at my response to op I also wrote that I found it unsuitable to use it in this case exactly due to the risk of being misunderstood.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unrelated to the topic but has anyone else noticed the quality of the soft serve has gone down dramatically in the last several years. I got a ice cream cone and it didn’t even taste good. I was looking at their advert for a Mcflurry and it looked all ice crystally and not good at all. If they can’t even make the picture look good that is saying something.

  • db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As a result of these shenanigans by Taylor and on their behalf McDonald’s itself I haven’t considered McDonald’s a viable place to go for any kind of ice cream or ice cream-adjacent thing for many years, whereas this was once not the case. I know I’m not the only one either.

    • Coeus@coeus.sbs
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t even thought about getting McDonald’s ice cream in years just because it seems like they are never able to serve it so I’m not even going to try. When I want ice cream I’ll go to the place that make ice cream on a cold slab.

    • Derproid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just stopped considering McDonalds a place that serves ice cream. The menu item just doesn’t exist there in my mind.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wonder how much this actually hurts their business? Probably more than they realize. My daughter loves ice cream, and I am not going to play McDonald’s roulette, unless I have to. We just go to Wendy’s if we are going to eat fast food, the foods better and cheaper anyway and I have yet to run into a broken machine.

        • Derproid@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It probably hurts the franchisee more than it hurts McDonalds proper, and they make it back and then some from their deal with Taylor.

    • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Taylor must pay McDonald’s a tidy sum for the exclusivity contract. Both parties make out like bandits in the deal. I’m kind of surprised McDonald’s never in-housed it out of greed, but that day may be coming due to all the negative publicity.

      • gammasfor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I suspect it’s a case of they thought they were getting a good deal out of this when they signed the contract but didn’t realise how much Taylor was going to take the piss until it was too late. Likely when the contract expires it probably won’t be renewed.

    • wjrii@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      From the article: “A DMCA exemption would allow McDonald’s franchises to legally do repair work on their own machines.”

      • Lojcs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wait, copyright can be used to prevent repairs? What is the justification? Is it a “ice cream machine company owns the copyright to mcdonalds ice cream and if you tamper with the machine you can’t call it McDonald’s ice cream anymore” kind of deal or is tampering straight up illegal?

        • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          The DMCA criminalizes the act of circumventing an access control, whether or not there is actual infringement of copyright itself.

          • Lojcs@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This only applies to digital access controls right? Otherwise those ‘warranty void if removed’ stickers would be legal

            • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think there needs to be a digital component but it can still apply to physical goods. Either way, “warranty void if removed” stickers aren’t a control. It only applies to “effective” controls:

              For the DMCA, circumvention means that there is a user attempting to “descramble a scrambled work, to decrypt an encrypted work, or otherwise to avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or impair a technological measure, without the authority of the copyright owner” – assuming that there is a technological measure in place that “effectively controls access to a work.”

              If you need to reverse engineer the product to bypass the access control, then that generally qualifies as an effective control. But if you can just press F12 or Escape or remove a sticker, that wouldn’t qualify as effective.

              (For what it’s worth I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.)

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh not necessarily. It’s a common joke, and ifixit gets publicity both for their own brand and for right to repair out of it

      Edit: unless you meant they’re getting something out of it being so locked down, in which case yeah. Corporate basically gets to pass the costs down to individual franchisees even more

      • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not defending McDonald’s or Taylor. Awful companies. And I’m all about the right to repair. But there’s some glaring YouTube style documentary oversimplification here.

        For instance, if someone who isn’t a technician - someone who’s sole motivation is to get the machine to spit out cold goop - can alter the parameters of temperature without verifying that it should be altered, therefore tricking the machine into thinking it reached or sustained safe temperatures during cleaning or normal operation, it could be a disaster for both McDonald’s and Taylor.

        Also safety aside, things like viscosity (because that a parameter you can change in technicians service menu too), being off potentially jeopardizes everything McDonald’s probably hopes to achieve in its franchise: global consistency.

        Also the UI sucks. But it’s not really cryptic to me. I’m idiot and could immediately tell you the errors at time stamp 18:10:

        LHPR>45F 1HR

        LPROD too VISC

        Means

        1. Left hopper went over 45 degrees Fahrenheit for 1 hour. A clear safety issue.

        2. Left side product is to viscous. A quality issue.

        And that was the best example of cryprtic error messages the video could come up with. And 3rd party app didn’t seem any better tbh, other than sending you an email. Which is nice for the owners, no doubt.

        It’s just a shit product. Made by shit companies. With little incentive to fix it. With McDonald’s and Taylor benefiting. Big bank take little bank. Not really an exposé.

        I actually think it’s a pretty poor video.

        Anyhow fuck McDonald’s. I’m gonna go back to not eating Mcjail food.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      McDonald’s Franchisee’s can’t buy anything other than these specific machines from Taylor. They can’t even buy the machines that Taylor sells to other chains like Wendy’s!

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kind of seems a bit pointless what they’re campaigning for in this regard. A DMCA exemption wouldn’t allow franchise owners to use an alternative repair company, as no doubt their franchise contract specifies who they can use.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      A DMCA exemption wouldn’t allow franchise owners to use an alternative repair company

      That’s not the point. Often there’s nothing actually wrong with the machine, you simply need to be able to reset a system flag which you can easily do using the box that Kytch makes. So the Franchisee buys a Kytch box and then doesn’t need to call ANYBODY.