qaz@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-24 months agoSchrödinger's USB-C, you only know if it supports what you want after you plug it inlemmy.worldimagemessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1679arrow-down114cross-posted to: 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
arrow-up1665arrow-down1imageSchrödinger's USB-C, you only know if it supports what you want after you plug it inlemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-24 months agomessage-square59fedilinkcross-posted to: 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-24 months ago I can trust that “3.1” means something This is also a problem. That 3.1 is the same as 2.X for some X that I don’t remember, that is the same as some number in the original standard. It would certainly be better than not marking, but no, that 3.1 doesn’t have a clear meaning.
This is also a problem. That 3.1 is the same as 2.X for some X that I don’t remember, that is the same as some number in the original standard.
It would certainly be better than not marking, but no, that 3.1 doesn’t have a clear meaning.