• Ryan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve read articles that were clearly created using ChatGPT, there was no extrapolation to add context/details to illustrate their points, and parts of it read like it just pulled from a Wikipedia page. The tone felt more robotic than pieces they published 6~8 months ago.

    ChatGPT can be useful when it’s part of a larger writing process, but I have a feeling that sites that create prompts and paste the output as their articles will slowly die-off because the quality isn’t there.

    • pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’re probing the limits of generative AI right now. I expect a snapback of sorts as people find what does and does not work.

    • Ser Salty@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was checking something on a Fandom “wiki” the other day and I swear to god the summary for a bunch of episodes for several shows was either written or rewritten by AI. You can tell because it uses a bunch of nonsense synonyms, like replacing the name Ray with Beam.