If you buy this, you are scammed.

  • torafugu@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Just wait until someone removes the entirety of the database instead of a GitHub branch. Then NFT people will understand how they wasted their fucking money.

    • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      What do you mean they’re over? I’ve invested billions of dollars in them. I’ve even given up on owning a house just so I can become the next sucessful billionaire investor. Away with your nonsense. Y’all just isn’t as smart as me. 🤓

      spoiler

      /s

    • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wonder whether they really are over. I have to imagine there will be future surges once negative sentiment fades and just the right novelty comes along.

  • Deestan@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago
    • Okay but I own the ring, even I’m not holding it.

    • Well… No, the ring is Sauron’s for legal reasons. You own a picture of it on the shared ledger.

    • Okay, so I can expect this picture to be under my control and ownership at least?

    • Well… No, you don’t “own” own it, and it’s not the picture either, really. It’s just a number. But! The number points to a row in Opensea’s database of pictures.

    • Okay, so I have ownership and control of that picture in Opensea’s database?

    • Hahaha no, they can remove it or change it and you can’t do a thing.

    • ndguardian@lemmy.studio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think the biggest place it has genuine benefit would be for something like deeds to homes, titles for cars and stuff like that. A permanent, auditable and public system for tracking the transfer and ownership of things.

      Unfortunately it comes with its own caveats, such as “what if I lose the wallet containing the deed to my home, and I want to sell it?”

      I never really understood the whole thing about picture based NFTs though.

      • TokyoMonsterTrucker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        We already have that without adding a completely useless layer of complexity. You’ve been able to look up property records online for decades. NFTs would add zero value to that system, and as you’ve correctly pointed out, have serious dowsides including lost, hacked, or stolen tokens.

        • I_hate_you_welcome@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          You pay for something and get a receipt. You get ownership of an original image, such as a painting, transferred by a verified owner or creator. It’s mostly used for art now because the reputation hasn’t matured enough for an authority to link it to a physical item. But being able to own a 1 in 5 Nike release with a receipt that never decays and that you can transfer to others and verify the authenticity of on your phone just seems like the next step in ownership. Same with video games, for example, it’d allow a true second hand digital games market if game ownership was verified by owning a copy on a blockchain.

          • jonsnothere@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            But you’re not the owner, though, you don’t get a copyright, the image is hosted externally, anything besides the receipt is just a contract which needs to be enforced via regular legal means and can be broken.

            • I_hate_you_welcome@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Copyright is something legal, so as long as the law is out of date, there’s no support for digital copyright transfers. But ownership and authenticity is certainly transferable.

              Anything better than the “you’ll own nothing and enjoy it” state of the internet today. It’d be amazing to own my movies and be able to transfer them to anyone I want.

              • jonsnothere@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Think of an NFT as a membership card to a club. You can sell your card to someone else, but there’s nothing stopping the club from changing their system and no longer accepting old cards, not letting someone in despite having a card, or going out of business.

                And you’ve never been able to own movies or video games, unless you made them yourself. NFT’s don’t change that either, you may own a receipt for access to something, but the club analogy still counts.

                • I_hate_you_welcome@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  And that whole comparison is only valid because there’s no laws about online ownership outside of copyright.

                  You don’t own anything at all, but NFTs are one of the only ways that we’ll ever be able to emulate ownership online. Seeing as our entire lives are moving there, I’m hopeful. You can be tired of them all you want, but nonetheless NFTs are the building blocks of decentralised ownership.

                  Also my copy of Pokémon Red and my Gameboy disagree with your statement about never owning a movie or game. I own most of my Switch games too, I can mod the cartridge however I want and I can resell it. Because I own it.

                  The whole point, by the way, is to have everything decentralised. You can’t take away my movies when there’s multiple, independent “sources” that I can claim the file from with my NFT. You don’t even need to give your private details away, you simply prove you own the private key that owns the NFT and you can watch your movie. Do you not see the bigger picture or are you too tired to look further?

  • shukufuku@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    No, you have your digital id in a database that also has a link to a picture of the precious. There is no implied ownership of the image.

    • torafugu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You own cash physically.

      Try again. And don’t say credit cards, because that’s still a physical object. Cash websites? It’s not like you own something pointless on there. It’s actually usable. NFTs are not.