• SaintxMeow@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really excited to see how this turns out. I think I would have loved just a standard skyrim type rpg from obsidian, but this direction shift makes it even more appealing.

    • Rick@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’m interested in a more linear experience honestly, I’m getting tired of open world games, I would love a refined version of Outer Worlds that’s set in a fantasy world. Having a linear experience with branching paths was a really enjoyable experience for me. I think it could give Obsidian the chance to craft way better worlds while telling epic stories as they are a fairly small dev team.

      • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed, Outer Worlds got a lot of grief for its length but I kind of liked the “30 hours and done” experience I had with it. It was pretty polished and enjoyable. It probably has something to do with the fact that I can’t just game for 8-12 hours like I used to when I was younger and didn’t have stuff to do, but I suspect I’m not the only person in that boat that grew up on F3, FNV, Oblivion & Skyrim.

        • Rick@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, also with Avowed they have the change to keep that 30ish hour experience while enhancing replayability compared to outer worlds. I would love to be able to start a character and now I can probably finish the playthrough in a week. My Skyrim characters can go on for months and halfway through I am wishing I could have a new character, but I also experience the sunken cost fallacy making me want to continue the save to the end.

        • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Once you add the add ons in it hits almost 40 which seemed about right for me.

  • Riley@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly I do wish more game developers would try to aim anywhere near where Skyrim is though. It was hugely successful but neither a sequel, spiritual successor, or major competitor has been released in the interim. It’s like a winning formula that hardly anyone else has tried to crack.

    • AnAngryDumpster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Might be a thing where nobody can do Skyrim better than skyrim, y’know? It’s been released so many times and with so many damn mods that I’d imagine it’s close to impossible to close in on that market share. Why play a skyrim-lite when I can just play Skyrim?

      • SirSauceLordtheThird@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get that, but at this point skyrim is over a decade old. A lot of people having been itching for a new game like it for a while, and bethesda has been focused on starfield and fallout for a while now. I’m honestly surprised no one has tried to cash in with a worthy competitor in the time that they’ve been busy

  • rowdy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still very excited for this release. But I was dissapointed to see the art direction changed to a more cartoony style - the original teaser was more realistic and dark. It kinda just looks like fantasy Outer Worlds now.

  • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have no complaints about this. MS have the “BIG” RPG covered with Starfield. Let Obsidian, InExile and Playground play to their own strengths with theirs.