• Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The Mario detection tool seems to be catching fan art in the crossfire, too.

    That’s the actual headline.

  • Quazatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Two can play that game. I bet it is possible to create an AI tool that generates and posts Mario pictures faster than they can take them down. Why you’d want to do that I don’t know.

  • nfms@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Energy wasted to create an AI image to have more energy wasted to have an AI remove it. I’d say this is a win for AI

      • PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I’ll stop using ai when Pearson stops using ai to generate broken homework assignments. Sometimes the only way to get whatever incorrect answer the ai autograder is looking for is to fish it out from the model.

  • Shadywack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I just want to see Nintendo go after all the Rule34 stuff. It might be the one thing that could exhaust their resources.

  • potat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Isn’t this the same broken AI that has been striking youtube videos about Minecraft clients? Why is every company suddenly using this?

    Edit: Yes it is. I really don’t know what to say anymore. Imagine applying youtube’s broken copyright system to the entire internet, but even worse.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        There are provisions in the DMCA for filing false claims.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s easy to file a DCMA claim.

          It’s harder to challenge it, let alone go after those faking it.

    • Rob200@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Simple. They won’t have to spend as much money. Of course them saving money won’t translate to lower Nintendo Switch prices, because they’l actually be making more money by keeping prices the same.

      and as long that mainstream consumers aren’t boycotting Nintendo on record profits from these changes related to ai, then Nintendo and other companies will keep the prices the same, aside from raising them in the future.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Flood the net with photos and make their AI work overtime costing them lots

    • Broken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Flood it with AI copies of official Mario content. Train the copyright software to associate the context of the official art to get the official art taken down.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Why does the title specify that the tool is taking down “AI-generated” pictures if the article focuses on how it’s taking down fan art indiscriminately?

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Every time I think shitendo can’t get any worse, they prove me wrong. I hate that company so much. They are like a rich brat kid with a toy he is telling everyone not to touch. Fuck off already

  • bizarroland@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I thought AI generated pictures were automatically public domain and unable to be copyrighted?

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You’ve got that the other way around. You can’t copyright AI generated pictures, but pictures created by AI can still be taken down as violations of copyright law.

    • wischi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I don’t think that’s how it works. If it exactly looks like something protected by laws like copyright or whatever your country uses, I highly doubt that any court would say that it’s fine just because it was created by AI.