Wayland and audio is fixed, but only on the canary branch for the moment, this isnt lazy either, they changed the whole screenshare flow to suit linux’s permission prompts

  • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    We would have to sit down and actually think what an opensource solution can achieve and how it gets traction. Also from the get go it should be clear that there will be no feature parity between it and discord. If it was me, I would cut out the whole chatroom functionality, leave private messaging in, use threaded conversations as a standard and but a decent videocall system on top. But this would be my version of it, other people have other needs.

    For the video call system you would not have to reinvent the wheel, use something existing like Jitsi (?) or alternatives. Then you would

    Maybe the best bet is to look at matrix and wrench out the chatroom focus and replace it with threads?

      • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        Not in my bubble, chats create insurmountable loads of noise. By focusing on threads you get the discussion much more focused and streamlined. Example: Most of my discords are ttrpg related, where with the usage of bots games are scheduled. Or where discussion are happening around certain ttrpg systems.

        I agree that a lot of discord servers focus on chat rooms. But you could retain that by simply having 1-2 chatrooms per server and structure/direct conversations to dedicated threads/voice chats instead.

        Again this is just MY view. I am totally aware that other people, use it differently.

        • Blisterexe@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 days ago

          that’s a totally fair view, and the people at matrix seem to agree because it has threading, seems to be the kind you like, too

          • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            No, matrix is still very focused on chat room sadly and for the video conferencing you need to use jitsi as far as I am aware, at least thats how we’ve set it up at work. The thread function in discord is much better actually.

            • Blisterexe@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              24 days ago

              oh, also matrix just added proper e2ee video conferencing that doesnt use jitsi, its a native feature

              • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                24 days ago

                I mean I am not sure, but in matrix you can just “reply” to a comment in a chat room and therefore create a thread? In discord you can have whole “chatrooms” be transfered to discussion only with threads. I am not sure about the terminology but it looks very different to me. Basically, you can set Discord up like a community board etc.