• cynar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    2 days ago

    The amusing thing is that the sun is actually quite a shit fusion reactor. It’s power per unit volume is tiny. It just makes it up in sheer volume. A solar level fusion reactor would be almost completely useless to us. Instead we need to go far beyond the sun’s output to just be viable.

    It’s like describing one of the mega mining dumper trucks as an “artificial mule”.

    • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think this energy density math really depends on whether only the core or the whole surface area is taken into consideration.

    • lurklurk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Arguably, the nearby sun scale fusion reactor has been fairly useful for us. Nowadays we can convert its output directly into electricity using solar cells

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I never said it wasn’t useful, just a very low efficiency reactor. Then again, if it was better, it would burn out faster, which would be bad for life on earth.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s part of the reason a moon base could be viable. The sun outputs a reasonable amount of helium 3, which is great for fusion reactions. Unfortunately it tends to sit at the top of our atmosphere and get blown away again. On the moon, it gets captured by the dust in collectable quantities.