• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    255
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    A whole 7 days??? Gosh gee willakers!!! You think people can uphold a boycott a whole 7 days???

    Look. Boycotts are effective, but you gotta be stubborn. It’s gotta be “boycott from now on” with no end date.

    Otherwise, it’ll just look like normal fluctuations in their business.

    “Oh, this week was slightly down…ah, but then it stopped. We’re good!”

    But if you boycott forever, then their numbers continuously go down. And if you get other people boycotting, those numbers go down faster.

    THAT’S how you make an impact.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      2 days ago

      How do you get people who can’t see themselves boycotting indefinitely? You get them used to it by getting them on board to boycott for a fixed length of time. Ideally, as they warm up to the idea, you get them to boycott for longer.

      • crabigno@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have ordered from them line 5 or 6 times, subscribed for a year because I wanted to watch a series by terry Pratchett, and never again interacted with it in the past 8 years or so. You are not boycotting food or water or oxygen.

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        True, but 7 days isn’t enough time for that. I’ve gone weeks between purchasing the kinds of things Amazon delivers, so it’d just be normal. 2+ months is probably better. Especially if those months are Nov & Dec.

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          2 days ago

          Some people can’t even handle a 1-day boycott. I think you’re overestimating the average person’s tolerance for discomfort.

        • crabigno@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have spent the 38 years I have accumulated without needing to buy a single thing from that particular company. WTF?

        • Knitwear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yeah but it lets people feel like they’ve boycotted. Which isn’t coddling/faux activism so much as it is starter-activism. We don’t want activism to seem hard… even though we know that effective activism pretty much requires meaningful changes to behaviour which often brings discomfort. People are really out of practice and our goal is getting people into the habit

          • crabigno@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Too late. If not buying unnecessary shit they don’t need from a particular retailer that could be replaced by any other during a previously delimited week seems revolutionary to them… I’m sorry but… They are a huge part of the problem.

    • marv99@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      In 1995 we boycotted Shell for environmental reasons and it worked: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brent_Spar

      Towing of the platform to its final position began on 11 June. By this time, the call for a boycott of Shell products was being heeded across much of continental northern Europe, damaging Shell’s profitability as well as brand image. […]

      On 20 June, Shell had decided that their position was no longer tenable, and withdrew their plan to sink the Brent Spar […]

      So it needed more than a week of concerted boycott action to bring big business into trouble, but not unlimited boycott.

      • villainy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That boycott had a demand attached, to prevent the sinking of the Brent Spar buoy. Effectively “unlimited” boycott until Shell gave into the demand.

        This and the last no shop Friday thing seem mostly pointless. I mean fuck Amazon for sure but shouldn’t there be some goal? “Boycott Amazon until X, Y, and Z” not “No buy from Amazon for a week but then we’ll be back so no worries!”

          • villainy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Implicit demands are for mob bosses and boat owners. If you’re threatening a corporation you need to be clear and direct.

            Less

            We are boycotting Amazon products until they stop be bad

            More

            We are boycotting Amazon products until they make another season of The Expanse

            Or whatever. Clear, concrete, demands.

    • rotmulaaginskyrim@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is how strikes are organized generally. You do limited time events too minimize the hurt on both sides, and bring them both to the table.