energy is converted and never destroyed so it’s true
[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others’ words. Weird, isn’t it?
Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0
energy is converted and never destroyed so it’s true
WILL NOT TOLERATE THIS TOM SCOTT SLANDER
Hmm, I guess I can see why you would read it that way, but I think we can agree to disagree: I read it as the second paragraph of the comment I linked to. 4B is about not having sexual relations with anyone, including those who one would otherwise desire.
lol yea. there’s a few reasons you didn’t find it:
https://kbin.melroy.org/m/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone/t/557849/epic-ratio-rule/comment/4844000#entry-comment-4844000
this is a horrible read. it’s about how men not getting incentive to do the right thing would result in e.g. lawmakers being pressured to repress women. it’s fine if they only 4b those who don’t respect them or abortion
If your concern was that I didn’t qualify the headline’s area of interest, I just did that. The headline was from the TechCrunch article this link post goes to.
Could you clarify what you mean by my description not matching the study nor title?
YSK that journals screen for conflict of interest, and none were found or declared here.
/s
The very second website in the file they use to track recently-moved websites uses substack (now).
Meanwhile, Automattic’s response to WP Engine’s lawsuit claimed the company “failed to plausibly allege specific financial harm.”
The footer says the site is operated by Automattic.
There were only “two parties in all States,” Randolph concluded. “The ins and the outs.” The ins construed governmental power broadly for the gain of their own “patronage and wealth,” while the outs tried to limit such power. “But let the outs get in . . . and you will find their Constitutional scruples and arguments vanish like dew before the morning sun.”
I’m not saying the system works or rises to the level of good. I’m saying that it is much better than the Russian system. The people at least get to choose who they think they want, and which group of people will be whipped more.
firstly I was joking
secondly, cautious ≠ squeamish. we shouldn’t be setting masculinity as an example