deleted by creator
no war but class war
deleted by creator
Yep, better disclaimers are inevitable. When they call it a ‘feature’ it isn’t getting fixed
Wait no, not direct action like that. You’re no supposed to try to influence the lesser of two evils. /s
A lot of the articles in the earlier link have links within to additional sources many of them are links to court documents but some are needs stories like this one. https://www.newsweek.com/orgies-harassment-fraud-satanic-temple-rocked-accusations-lawsuit-1644042 obviously Newsweek isn’t great but I’m on Mobile atm and it’s the first one I found, I’m sure you can find more and from better sources in their article or a search and a lil time
Because TST is shit and can’t follow through on their promises and use the courts to go after dissenters.
Plenty of reading at https://queersatanic.com/articles/ but a pattern becomes visible pretty quickly.
Israel does fund hamas though, so they’re kinda dealing with them in a different way
I feel that, like if a lib had posted this then they’d have been sincere about it but it was you posting it so we all know what’s up
That’s an actual liberal stance I see thrown around way too often so without a /s or some other explicit commentary I can understand why the post would be taken at face value or without assuming there’s an implied sentiment.
Was is ever not completely under capitalism? As far as I’ve seen they were always fully going with hype over substance posturing
Pure enshittification, squeezing both sides. I had no idea on this part but that would explain a lot, fuckin wild
Here’s how that worked: when you ran a query like “children’s clothing,” Google secretly appended the brand name of a kids’ clothing manufacturer to the query. This, in turn, triggered a ton of ads – because rival brands will have bought ads against their competitors’ name (like Pepsi buying ads that are shown over queries for Coke).
Here we see surpluses being taken away from both end-users and business customers – that is, searchers and advertisers. For searchers, it doesn’t matter how much you refine your query, you’re still going to get crummy search results because there’s an unkillable, hidden search term stuck to your query, like a piece of shit that Google keeps sticking to the sole of your shoe.
But for advertisers, this is also a scam. They’re paying to be matched to users who search on a brand name, and you didn’t search on that brand name. It’s especially bad for the company whose name has been appended to your search, because Google has a protection racket where the company that matches your search has to pay extra in order to show up overtop of rivals who are worse matches. Both the matching company and those rivals have given Google a credit-card that Google gets to bill every time a user searches on the company’s name, and Google is just running fraudulent charges through those cards.
“They trust me — dumb fucks,” says Zuckerberg
Always good to keep in mind
That’s really fucked up, hopefully he’s not a teacher anymore
Wouldn’t the api hit the cloud, isn’t it just a different interface?
There are no humans on the internet
The pilling factory called…
Religion and a racism, two birds one meme!
Like is the really a need to use a hard n or to share some old shit that includes it
This reads like a highschool newspaper written by a reporter that hasn’t seen financial statements before and think they found a “gotcha”
I read somewhere they were working on dos3 and put it on hold when bg3 came up. If they go back and work on the dos series I’ll be there for it!