This made me chuckle

No, not if you’re not American

They all technically are subject to the same terms, they just don’t bug you about it the way suse does

Is this what’s meant by the null hypothesis?

It’s German, so it’s susa

You can help by expanding it

Eh, depends. If it’s the around-the-neck kind of crystals, no way. If it’s in a radio circuit, now, that’s a different story.

Alpine is fucking bae. I love that little distro so goddamned much.

Seitan is cool but I really want to try jack fruit

I prefer writing in “Satan” over leaving it blank

We need a Wolfenstein CAPTCHA that just asks “select all Nazis” to reiterate that being a Nazi is fucking bad.

based

And with that, FiskFisk33 was enlightened.

Certainly, I don’t disagree with that at all. And that’s likely part of the reason so few people publish failures, because there’s no “reward”. All I was saying is there’s still value there.

I wish more people would publish their failures. Definitive proof that a hypothesis is wrong is just as solid a result as definitive proof the hypothesis is right.

I hate that I can’t photosynthesize.

our our

Ok but a soda or carbonated water that has lost most of its target fizzyness quotient (scientific term) is still regarded as being flat even if it has some carbonation left. If it were a sliding scale instead of “a” vs “b”, then we could imagine a “locally flat” taste profile while admitting that the whole is not entirely flat. Which is a perfect description of Earth’s geometry.

I learned cursory electronics and circuits in my physics curriculum.