On the other hand if the number keeps going down it helps strengthen hope that it can go down to 0. When these things happen some apparatus gets left behind on how to do it a again for rogue actors inside the country too.

Their religion is pathetic if it can be flattened by two dudes kissing or a girl having shlong.

Except we shouldn’t be giving corporations same rights as individuals. Doing so leads to corporate feudalism.

Those should be your expectations when you are on the shop floor and that should allow you to reject the purchase if it’s s deal breaker for you. Not when you’re crossing railway tracks.

When it’s been advertised to the user as “full self driving”, is it?

I wouldn’t believe an advertisement.

No because you will be using duckduckgo or something else

You must not have been born during LAN party era where everybody’s PC was physicaly connected to each other.

Jokes on them, I am a grumpy bastard who hates emotionally expressive humans.

If you kill all your prisoners there’s no hope for reform

The devs that made Helldivers MUST have been aware of Sony’s mandatory PSN policy. This is just a sob story and throwing Sony under the bus at this point.

Easy: Don’t be a greedy asshole and don’t sell in regions with no PSN support.

As opposed to being bland and boring?

If you need something in a pinch to substitute a tool you memorized, skill issue is a valid excuse to reject Linux.

It’s corporate speak for “It’s no longer hip and cool to objectify women”… or wait… I guess it is supposed to be “It’s not mysogny if the women like it”… but who knows…

If a theme is able to break core functionality then your theming system/guidelines needs to be fixed. And it to be more accessible to theme designers so these problems don’t occur in the first place.

Same here. Disabled it a year back.

This is same as feeling bad for people who think others shouldn’t be getting caught in MLM schemes.

I don’t agree with your argument.

Making a human go to prison for wiping out a family of 4 isn’t going to bring back the family of 4. So you’re just using deterrence to hopefully make drivers more cautious.

Yet, year after year… humans cause more deaths by negligence than tools can cause by failing.

The question is definitely “How much safer are they compared to human drivers”

It’s also much easier to prove that the system has those issues fixed compared to training a human hoping that their critical faculties are intact. Rigorous Software testing and mechanical testing are within legislative reach and can be made strict requirements.

It’s supposed to work like that. You’re naive to think it actually does work like that for a majority of companies nowadays.

That would never transpire. Their brains only have transcient learning capabilities.