Low doses of ibuprofen are better as an anti-inflammatory, and higher doses are better for pain relief, from what I’ve learned online (I’m not a doctor).
I imagine the muscle pain you were dealing with was due to inflammation from overexertion or something?

It can be prescribed in much higher dosages, unlike paracetamol, but the regular over the counter stuff is the same.

200 ibuprofen = 250 paracetamol
Extra strength just doubles both
But prescription for ibuprofen can go up a bit from that. Never seen a higher prescription for paracetamol.

I think you replied to the wrong comment

It seems like you’ve mistaken what “strong” means.

But I shouldn’t have said “long term”. The dangers of each are different.
Ibuprofen is relatively safe to go a bit over the recommended dose, but not over the recommended duration.
Paracetamol is relatively safe to go over the recommended duration, but not the recommended dose.

You’re the second person I’ve seen saying that ibuprofen is stronger than paracetamol. Where does that come from?

It is slightly stronger, but the dose is smaller. A single dose of router either is roughy the same pain reduction, and similar damage for exceeding their recommended usage

I don’t think that actually happens.

Ibuprofen and paracetamol are roughly the same in theme of pain relief and harm in long-term use.

Honestly I think the Americans have it right, here.

You end up taking fewer painkillers of you start taking them early and get ahead of the pain. If you wait until the pain is already severe, you end up taking more.

Idk why this happens, it’s info I got from a nurse, and intuitively it feels right.

I’ve fantasized about this.

I had some friends who actually DID build a secret room behind a bookshelf, where they had their home theatre or something like that I forget (they were more like close coworkers of my wife than my own friends, but they were super nice).

What exactly do you think my current position is?

There was never a fig leaf. They already didn’t need to devote any attention to political cover, the USA already made it clear that it wouldn’t tolerate holding Israel or any of the Israeli politicians accountable in international courts.

The difference between the two is purely in wording and absolutely immaterial. If anything, trump is being more honest about it.

Trump is terrible for other reasons, but they’re both equal in this matter

how about his commitment to arm Israel with no strings attached? No humanitarian aid, no cease fires…

Oh you mean exactly like right now?

Anyone who thinks that orange man is an improvement is an idiot. But anyone who thinks Kamala would be better is also an idiot.

Israel is already getting everything they could ever wish for. There is nothing that Trump could offer that they’re not already getting, including protection from the international community.

I realize that the news show doesn’t necessarily reflect the Dem, but you know it does

Increased suffering?
How can their suffering be increased more than it is now?

Israel is already getting everything could have ever wished for. There is nothing trump could do to make that worse.

There were other reasons to vote for Harris, but this wasn’t one.

What will trump do to cause more Palestinian deaths?
What COULD he do?

Israel is already getting everything they wanted, and facing zero consequences or obstacles.

I don’t disagree with you wrt American deaths, but that’s not what this post is about

Notice how you didn’t actually give a reason?

Did my name give it away? 😏

But yes, I appreciate that sentiment 😩

One hell of a FUPA

Not to be pedantic (😏):

You got your first sentence backwards.
Nzi does always mean authoritarian, but authoritarian doesn’t always mean nzi.

I can’t bring myself to write the word, I feel like if I spell it out, I’ma be put on a list and start getting YouTube ads for Tate and shit.

Instructions unclear.
Got dick stuck in the upside-down