Going by the popular votes, no, actually.

Yamaha Pacificas are a great first guitar in terms of value for money.

No. They do not.

Indeed I did. I’ll own up to that mistake.

The rest is projection, I’m afraid. Your should probably spend some time in reflection, but you’re not going to.

Get whatever jibe is left in you out of your system and be on your way.

GOURANGA

Never said they were equally exploitative, just that we all suffer from some level of economic coercion.

What you are doing is what’s called strawmanning. It’s where you reframe an argument you are unable to counter to a slightly different one that you are able to counter.

I’d say it’s beneath you, but it honestly doesn’t seem to be.

You deflected first by invoking economic coercion. Unless it’s your firm belief that there are zero people who would knowingly choose to fuck for money over taking a menial job.

Get better talking points than these sad little ad hominems, they aren’t helping you.

Guy who refuses to answer the first question asked continues to deflect because he knows there’s no logical position he can take that isn’t ‘I don’t like sex workers’.

We’re all victims of economic coercion. Very few would willingly work service or clerical jobs if they didn’t need to.

If that’s your rubrik, then whatever your opinion of Johns is, it should consistently be applied to anyone who ever buys any product or uses any service.

We all work because we need to get paid to survive. Knowing that, how do you believe those who choose for that work to be sex work should be treated?

Someone needs to own a car still.

And that someone can’t be available every day when I need to do two school runs and an office trip.

That someone can’t always be available when the sink springs a leak and I need to go buy some new washers and plumber’s mait.

I really question your life experience at this point. If you’re single, childless and living in a big city, sure, cars are very unnecessary. For most people this isn’t the case

Unironically, “you were my brother, Anakin. I loved you” though I suppose it is more of just a line rather than a whole scene. Ewan was too good for those films.

For real, the pavements here are like bunched-up carpet from all the roots, lol

It’s a town of 90k people. The kind of town that the vast majority of people in the UK live in.

Just out of curiosity how can you transport something large and bulky, that isn’t allowed on public transport, let’s say furniture, or the remains of a shed you dismantled or any one of a hundred inconvenient loads that occur during your life without a car?

Great, well I have a six year old that needs to get to his school which is about a mile and a half away and I need to get to work 20 mins after which is about three miles in the other direction.

I then also need to do his pickup during my lunch break.

Most people’s lives don’t work without a car because that’s not the society that car ownership created.

The train doesn’t stop at the recycling centre. Nor does it stop at my childrens’ schools. Ditto my office, the supermarket, IKEA, the house of the person I just bought weed from.

The layout of our towns expanded with the ubiquity of cars. Services agglomerated and became situated where land was cheap rather than central.

Bikes and light mass transit have their use cases but removing cars is not feasible for the majority of households

Hard to carry a TV on a bicycle, or transport loads to the recycling centre, or drop my kids off at school or any one of a thousand things that occur day to day.

Our world redesigned itself with the invention of cars. Trying to exist without them is very hard for your average family, especially those who live outside cities.

Or the tree trunk grew to the asphalt.

How do you believe women (and men, and NBs) who willingly go into this line of work should be treated?

Yeah, because it’s a jraphical interface format.

Big logical gaps in this argument:

The op never said they were superior morally.

Even, given the above, the op deemed chickens immoral that does not make all chickens’ actions immoral. Preening, roosting and eating grain are not immoral activities.

Defining only the horrible acts as horrible is a circular argument as no definition has been provided as horrible.

Other than those three, you really stuck it to the carnist, chief.