Make that 2…
Make that 2…
Make that 2…
Same here! They made a DS one as a third installment, but the story leaves off in the middle, and the sense of awe just isn’t there. Not the same anyway as 1&2. Especially 2, when you [SPOILER] play the “bad” guys
You are correct – I misread the post. Here is my amended list:
It generally happens often without pre-planning and modularizing sections of developed code (even harder with data science, given the often functional nature of data science code bases). But when it does happen, it doesn’t have to be aweful.
To resolve, I generally just create a safe local branch to temporarily complete the merge in that I created form my local copy, and then I pull in the remote copy that I want to merge in with mine using git merge -X theirs ${THEIR_BRANCH_NAME}
, which favors their remote changes over yours (I assume origin is more correct than me). Then, conflicts will arise, and you manually perform diffs and checkin the final version with conflicts resolved as a new commit locally. Once complete, it is generally safe to push that temp branch to the remote or your fork for a Pull Request submission, or you may merge the temp branch with the conflict resolves into your running branch. Either way, before the PR, make sure to run tests with the integrated changes first, and to pull merged remote afterwards to fast forward your running copy (such as with git merge -X theirs origin/${HEAD}
or git pull origin/${HEAD}
Best answer though: pre plan your code base to include some modularity so that 2 people aren’t actively working on the same file at once, encourage daily check-ins to remotes and daily pulls, and ensure that headless unit tests are in place for critical areas, such as logic and boundary cases, at minimum (and that those run in CI/CD). +1 if you use uniform docker tooling to ensure all environments, even local, are the same. And another +1 if you have good telemetry based on APM metrics and traces for after code is integrated.
Here’s a short list of my favorites:
EDIT: I misread the post… updated for GB only
I’ve used it only once to find a bug in a section of code at a company I was working for that both me and the other engineer I was working with did not know the history of. We were able to triangulate effectively the root of the pre-existing bug, and kind of how it was introduced, because of the surrounding history. Very useful tool for this purpose, albeit one that I use very infrequently.