It’s not the same though, those are fictional characters. I know a real person made them, but still, it’s not the same
How do you define Tech bros? I lump them in Commerce category in my head.
Computer Science/Engineering people I have encountered are more into liberatory politics (whether they overtly acknowledge it/are awareof it or not)
I think Arts and Sciences folks need to team up and fuck up Commerce bros.
Not available on f droid yet it seems
iOS
I’m sorry but there likely never be a long-term alternative for free software such as this on that platform. Neither you nor the developer has much say on how to use it.
I think the aussie contestant is getting disproportionate amount of mockery (and even hate). It’s becoming borderline bullying
At least it’s not wrong
It is kinda yucky that most of these “standards” for women map with the bodies of young girls
See, replication isn’t a problem if your entire field is vibes-based. A lot of economics papers I come across are like that (so much so that I am close to writing off the entire decipline as unscientific). The level of rigour you would see in e.g. particle physics versus in economics is baffling.
It used to be psychology as well but I am noticing they are more than aware of their replication crisis lately. Whereas economics feels pseudoscience with a maths clothing.
No it does not mean that.
Black holes aren’t like magnets
Reputation comes from public, it requires collective action and coordination. Collective action is not easy, but it is not as hard it might seem either. For example, many open source projects in software are highly reputable without a private ownership.
Steve Jobs was no different from the rest in Silicon Valley who would spout virtues out loud while simultaneously undermining them in practice.
For those curious, this was called a “casette tape”
I believe this is the video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ta0imAIz31M
Thanks!
SNe?
Yeah but maybe someone else does it