It’s certainly true. Trump’s also close with Musk these days, and Musk certainly will pressure him to allow Grok to vacuum up all the data for free.
It’s certainly true. Trump’s also close with Musk these days, and Musk certainly will pressure him to allow Grok to vacuum up all the data for free.
I mean, the rules would allow everybody to get around copyright in this way. A rule like that would apply to all the indie LORA trainers as well.
I don’t think this will make much difference honestly, we already have very little regulation here. It probably means that there will be copyright exemptions for training models. And honestly eroding copyright bit by bit is okay in my book.
What we should be worried about are the human rights that are about to be violated.
It’s not hard to max out when doing simulations in Blender, but I know I have a niche use case.
Me too. High five! (But not like, in person. Because I’m not leaving my house.)
Agreed. The aggressive depth of field is another smoking gun that usually indicates an AI image.
I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job. Just because it’s not AI doesn’t mean it’s real.
But also the detector is probably wrong - it’s likely an AI image using a different model than the detector was trained to detect.
To be fair, I think the majority of stand up comedians are also painful to listen to.
But you’re right, this is an exaggerated caricature of reality, like Monty Python or the Three Stooges but far less so.
Indeed, it turns out that high quality content is high effort, and therefore has a weaker ROI. I know it’s simply game theory, I just hate this particular game.
When will humans stop enjoying painfully staged videos like this? Like, who tilts the object away from themself but towards the camera to check why it’s not working?
He’s probably got a dumb name, like Bill or Willie.
In fact, we should actively try to make it hostile to advertisements.
Sometimes! I think pumpkins are fairly harmless though
They’re not ultimately making it for people to use. They’re creating a playground for AI to work and learn in, thereby letting their AI access human behavior data that other companies don’t yet have.
Basically it’s a ploy to get a novel set of proprietary data in hopes that their AI gets smarter than the competition.
Counterpoint, while it might be ethical to eat free range billionaire, it’s the least tasty of human meat because of all the cocaine use and STDs.
Being honest about it makes friends with all the right people anyway.
Yeah the way I phrased it was super awkward
Safari is WebKit, which branched off from Chrome when Google forked WebKit into Blink. So they’re like siblings.
I dunno if this changes any of the UX paradigms, but I heard GIMP is about to release a huge major version.