Unpopular opinion, but Tesla model 3 has been the best car with the lowest total cost of ownership.
Electricity is cheaper than gas by a lot, no moving parts or fluids to replace except washer fluid, brakes last forever since it’s Regen braking.
It’s also pretty fun to drive.
Not a fan of the dude, and never bought into the hype on the tech side, but it’s a solid car.
The cloud givith and the cloud taketh
No, because I need too much information for work. This would render me unable to perform my work, so I would need at least the replacement salary.
Not really.
Now the 15 sponsored links will be irrelevant to YOU as a user since they can’t personalize the ads.
They can still use context advertising which does not use your personal information but only what you are giving to them for search.
Amazon search is probably the least impacted by this, since they use context advertising by default.
Rampant alcoholism.
You mean x football fields.
Coincidentally both “football fields” are pretty close in length.
Just switched to them. Would recommend so far.
You can also copyright the original character and make AI generate all the motions of that character. Since the originals was (human) created and copyrighted, it doesn’t matter that AI created art derived from that character isn’t copyrightable in of itself.
Plus there is also trademarks for character likeness.
All in all, I agree with you, this is a non issue for Hollywood studios.
Visited this summer and had a wonderful time. The city is awesome in the summer and people are very friendly.
This.
YouTubeTV carries network channels that directly charge YouTube TV carriage fees. Those channels charge a pretty hefty fee regardless of who you get the channels through.
https://variety.com/vip/pay-tv-true-cost-free-1234810682/
This is not YouTube premium.
It actually does get higher revenue for content creators for the majority of your creators. Average per view is something like 5-10x vs non premium views.
It’s based around your watch time and something like 50%? of your subscription split across the channels you watch.
Ad impressions pay very little on YouTube.
You can train an effective one for a few hundred bucks now.
That’s not how any of this works.
Removing the Canadian news from Facebook doesn’t hurt Facebook one bit. It’ll just hurt Canadians by preventing them from seeing news from local sources.
Facebook never needed news to keep people engaged. They just need content, and they don’t give a shit whether that content reflects reality or not, nor do they care of the content came from Canada.
But hey, I’m the corporate shill right? Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
Oh great, I was hoping we left all the sarcastic non-comments that attack people and adds nothing to the discussion in the speddit botscape.
Can we not?
This is not great at all. You’ll just have pseudo “news” organizations fill the void.
Your crazy uncles won’t stop sharing articles, but instead of coming from Fox News, they’ll be coming from AI spin-offs of infowars and AI Epoch times.
But that’s as high as the meter……
This was more or less a reflection of my personal experience.
When I was in school, we were taught how to do research. It involves going to Libraries and looking for primary secondary and tertiary sources via the Dewey decimal system. We were taught how to use almanacs and even had an almanac competition on how fast someone can find information.
Public institutions such as the Library system in the United States, were our “temple” of knowledge. Public support for Libraries was historically VERY high.
However, since the popularization of search engines, it has radically reshaped our expectations of finding information. We expect to find it at our fingertip, in less than 200ms, at the cost of quality and gatekeeping institutions that filtered out a lot of junk knowledge.
I was able to find a few articles talking about this: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2477/2279
I especially love the quote, “Conflation of information retrieval with knowledge”
Hard to make much out of this data. Does this mean the further collapse of judicial efficacy in China? Or does this more or less reflect a different typo of judicial system where prosecutors will only pursue when conviction is guaranteed like the Japanese system?
Both of you are assholes.
Nothing warrants destroying things over a perceived misgendering.
At the same time, a bit of an asshole response from you, when you could have just politely said that you meant dude as gender neutral term