Please describe to me how someone who offered up changes to change “he” to “they” for them, and then the contributor getting pissy about “politics” is denying work.
Please describe to me how someone who offered up changes to change “he” to “they” for them, and then the contributor getting pissy about “politics” is denying work.
That’s not how fractions and math work though.
Okay but like, you also realize gas fees for transactions can get stupid expensive right? Banks don’t have variable rates.
That’s what they said about bitcoin, and there’s still nothing useful at any kind of scale outside of scams.
That’s not what Planck length is. It’s the minimum resolvable accuracy not measurement. Meaning we can’t prove something was somewhere specific beyond the Planck length. Not that it’s the building size of the universe.
it is a common misconception that it is the inherent “pixel size” or smallest possible length of the universe.[1] If a length smaller than this is used in any measurement, then it has a chance of being wrong due to quantum uncertainty
If you want my credentials, the second book is deriving the hydrogen atom.
deleted by creator
Being continuous is not actually a requirement of being real.
That’s not what I said?
They’re “stable” energy states. That’s all.
A real number is the set of both rational and irrational numbers. Nothing about continuous anything.
deleted by creator
They don’t make “discrete jumps” as in teleportation. They exist stable in discrete energy levels, but that doesn’t imply things don’t move continuously.
Mmmmmm don’t know about that.
The Planck length is the minimum resolvable accuracy of the universe. That doesn’t mean it’s a building block like the electron is.
That’s an appeal to authority fallacy if I’ve ever seen one.
They’re doing proof of concepts, not mass production. They’re at best answering is it possible, not is it a viable alternative.