• Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even in America, I have seen a fair few parents carrying their kids around by bike. It seems it’s not totally impossible, though you may need to put your bike through some upgrades.

    • andy_wijaya_med@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t dare to bring my now 3 months old baby with bike. The weather is still "summer"y now. In winter I wouldn’t do it. I myself have fallen down from bikes at least 4 times in the last couple of years. I can’t imagine if that happens while I’m taking my baby with bike.

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s possible, but it’s really obnoxious and shitty. Especially if the weather is too cold for a new born to be outside.

      New born parents is one of the few true excuses to use a car over a bike, imo.

      But that’s okay, we’ll still need roads for emergency services anyway so it’s okay if some people use them.

    • pewter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bet those people are doing it for economic reasons, not environmental ones. A bicycle is probably the most dangerous form of transportation for you to have your kid on.

      • Michal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        How us bicycle more dangerous than cars?

        Sure cars have all the safety features for people on the inside, but on a bike you’re exposed to much slower speeds and better field of view. Bike accidents have much smaller fatality rate than car accidents.

        Unless of course you mean cycling among cars is less safe, but that argument just confirms that cars are unsafe, not bikes. Bikes are not dangerous. Cars are.

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It wouldn’t be any dangerous if car and bike infrastructure was structurally separated (and if there were far fewer cars).

            • pewter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Of course, but if my vehicle was the only vehicle in the world, I’d still feel like a 2 year old kid on the back of my bike going 7 miles is more dangerous than on a bus, train, or even a car over the same distance.

              • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Fair enough, a seat on the back is the least safe option to transport kids.

                There are options like this though. Seatbelts, low position, side walls.

                • pewter@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t mind this too much, but I’d want more padding for the kid and an extra wheel in the back for stability.